Elasticity of Demand: Types, Measurement Methods, and Influencing Factors | Economics Notes

Understanding Elasticity of Demand: Types, Measurement Methods, and Influencing Factors

Elasticity of demand stands as one of the most critical concepts in economic analysis, providing valuable insights into consumer behavior and market dynamics. At its core, elasticity measures the degree of responsiveness in quantity demanded when economic variables change. This comprehensive examination reveals that demand elasticity varies significantly across different products and market conditions, with measurement approaches ranging from point elasticity to arc elasticity methods. The concept not only helps businesses optimize pricing strategies but also enables policymakers to anticipate market reactions to regulatory changes. Understanding these elasticity relationships provides essential tools for economic forecasting, business planning, and policy development in today's complex markets.

Conceptual Foundation of Elasticity of Demand

Elasticity of demand refers to the degree of responsiveness in the quantity demanded of a commodity when there is a change in any of its determinants. This fundamental economic concept measures how sensitive consumers are to changes in economic variables such as price, income, or the prices of related goods. The elasticity of demand is expressed as the percentage change in quantity demanded divided by the percentage change in another economic variable, creating a unitless ratio that facilitates comparisons across different products and markets15. This responsiveness varies greatly between different products and services, allowing economists to categorize goods based on consumer sensitivity to various market changes.

The concept of elasticity provides a more nuanced understanding of market behavior than simple demand curves alone. While demand curves illustrate the inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded, elasticity quantifies the magnitude of that relationship. This quantification enables businesses and policymakers to predict with greater precision how markets will respond to changes in economic conditions. For instance, understanding the elasticity of demand for a product helps companies determine optimal pricing strategies and anticipate revenue changes when market conditions shift13.

Alfred Marshall, in his groundbreaking 1890 work "Principles of Economics," formalized the concept of elasticity of demand, though the underlying ideas had been discussed by economists before him. Marshall defined elasticity as the responsiveness of quantity demanded to price changes, noting that this responsiveness could be either gradual or rapid depending on the nature of the good in question13. This foundational definition has evolved into a sophisticated analytical tool that helps explain consumer behavior across diverse market conditions and product categories.

Significance in Economic Analysis

The elasticity concept serves as a crucial analytical tool in multiple economic contexts. For businesses, elasticity information guides pricing strategies, production planning, and marketing decisions. For policymakers, understanding elasticity helps predict the effects of taxation, subsidies, and regulatory measures on consumer behavior and market outcomes. The concept also provides insights into consumer welfare and market efficiency by revealing how changes in economic variables redistribute resources and affect utility maximization decisions1517.

Types of Elasticity of Demand

Price Elasticity of Demand (PED)

Price elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded to changes in a product's price while holding all other factors constant. This type of elasticity is particularly significant in economic analysis as it directly relates to one of the most fundamental relationships in economics-the law of demand. The formula for calculating price elasticity of demand is expressed as the percentage change in quantity demanded divided by the percentage change in price1517. This relationship captures how consumers adjust their purchasing decisions when faced with price changes in the marketplace.

PED values reveal important information about consumer behavior and market characteristics. When the absolute value of PED is greater than one, demand is considered elastic, indicating that consumers are highly responsive to price changes. In these markets, a price increase leads to a proportionally larger decrease in quantity demanded. Conversely, when the absolute value of PED is less than one, demand is inelastic, meaning consumers are relatively unresponsive to price changes. For these goods, a price increase leads to a proportionally smaller decrease in quantity demanded13. A PED value exactly equal to one represents unit elasticity, where the percentage change in quantity demanded exactly equals the percentage change in price.

The concept of price elasticity has significant implications for business strategies and revenue management. For products with elastic demand, price reductions can increase total revenue as the increase in quantity sold more than compensates for the lower price. For products with inelastic demand, price increases may boost total revenue as the decrease in quantity sold is proportionally smaller than the price increase13. This understanding enables businesses to optimize pricing strategies based on the elasticity characteristics of their products.

Income Elasticity of Demand (YED)

Income elasticity of demand measures how responsive the quantity demanded of a good is to changes in consumer income, with all other factors remaining constant. This elasticity type provides crucial insights into how spending patterns evolve as economies grow and consumer purchasing power changes. Mathematically, income elasticity is calculated as the percentage change in quantity demanded divided by the percentage change in consumer income17. This ratio reveals the nature of goods in terms of how they fit into consumer budgets and preference hierarchies.

Based on income elasticity values, goods can be classified into several categories. Normal goods have positive income elasticity, meaning that as income rises, demand for these products increases. Within normal goods, necessities typically have income elasticity between zero and one, while luxury goods have income elasticity greater than one. Inferior goods, conversely, have negative income elasticity values, indicating that demand decreases as income rises because consumers shift to higher-quality alternatives(14,7). These classifications help economists understand consumption patterns and predict market trends as economies develop.

Income elasticity measurements also provide valuable information for business planning and economic development policies. Businesses can use income elasticity data to forecast demand as economies grow or contract, helping them make strategic investment decisions. Similarly, policymakers can better understand how economic growth translates into changing consumption patterns and improved living standards across different income groups. This makes income elasticity a powerful tool for both microeconomic and macroeconomic analysis1517.

Cross Elasticity of Demand (XED)

Cross elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded of one good to changes in the price of another good, with all other factors held constant. This type of elasticity reveals the relationships between different products in the marketplace, providing insights into competitive dynamics and consumption patterns. The formula for cross elasticity is calculated as the percentage change in quantity demanded of good A divided by the percentage change in the price of good B (14,5). This measurement helps economists and businesses understand how products interact in consumer purchasing decisions.

The sign and magnitude of cross elasticity values indicate the relationship between goods. A positive cross elasticity value suggests that the goods are substitutes – when the price of one increases, demand for the other rises as consumers switch between alternatives. Examples include different brands of smartphones or various types of breakfast cereals. Conversely, a negative cross elasticity value indicates that the goods are complements – they are used together, so when the price of one increases, demand for both decreases. Examples include printers and ink cartridges or cars and gasoline15. When cross elasticity is close to zero, it suggests that the goods are independent, with no significant relationship between them.

In markets characterized by oligopoly, where multiple firms compete with similar products, cross elasticity analysis becomes particularly valuable for understanding competitive dynamics. Businesses can use cross elasticity measurements to identify their closest competitors, understand the impact of competitors' pricing strategies on their own products, and develop effective product positioning and marketing approaches. This makes cross elasticity an essential tool for competitive analysis and strategic planning in multi-product markets15.

Measurement Methods for Elasticity of Demand

Point Elasticity Method

The point elasticity method calculates elasticity at a specific point on the demand curve, providing a precise measurement for infinitesimal changes in price and quantity. This approach is particularly useful for continuous demand functions where calculus can be applied to determine the exact elasticity at any given point. The mathematical formula for point elasticity is expressed as the percentage change in quantity divided by the percentage change in price, which can be written as (∂Q/Q)/(∂P/P), where ∂ represents a very small change18. This formula captures the slope of the demand curve at that particular point, reflecting the responsiveness of quantity demanded to price changes for very small variations.

Point elasticity offers several advantages for economic analysis, especially when working with well-defined demand functions. By using calculus to calculate the derivative of the demand function, economists can determine the exact elasticity at any point along the curve. This precision is valuable for theoretical models and for analyzing markets where small price changes are common. Additionally, point elasticity is useful for forecasting the immediate impact of minor price adjustments on consumer demand, helping businesses make fine-tuned pricing decisions18.

Despite its theoretical elegance, the point elasticity method has practical limitations. It requires a known demand function that can be differentiated, which is not always available in real-world scenarios. Moreover, the method only applies to infinitesimal changes, making it less suitable for analyzing the effects of substantial price adjustments that businesses often consider. These limitations have led economists to develop complementary approaches, such as arc elasticity, that address the challenges of measuring elasticity for discrete and larger price changes18.

Arc Elasticity Method (Midpoint Formula)

The arc elasticity method, first introduced by Hugh Dalton, measures the elasticity between two points on a demand curve using the midpoint of these points as a reference. This approach was developed to address the asymmetry problem that arises when calculating elasticity between two points – the result differs depending on which point is treated as the "original" and which as the "new" one. The arc elasticity formula uses average values for both price and quantity: elasticity = [(Q₂-Q₁)/((Q₁+Q₂)/2)]/[(P₂-P₁)/((P₁+P₂)/2)]1318. This method produces a single elasticity value that represents the average responsiveness over that section of the demand curve.

The midpoint formula offers significant advantages for practical economic analysis. By using the average of the two points as the base for percentage calculations, it provides a consistent elasticity value regardless of which point is considered first. This symmetry makes the arc elasticity method particularly valuable for empirical research and business applications where analysts need to evaluate the impact of actual price changes that have occurred or are being considered. The method is also accessible for practical use as it requires only observable price and quantity data without needing a complete demand function1318.

Practical examples illustrate the application and importance of the arc elasticity method. For instance, if a price increases from $50 to $120 (a change of $70) and quantity falls from 40 to 20 units (a change of 20 units), the arc elasticity calculation would use midpoints of $85 for price and 30 for quantity. This gives a percentage change in quantity of -0.67 and a percentage change in price of 0.82, resulting in a price elasticity of demand of approximately -0.8118. This example demonstrates how the arc elasticity method provides a meaningful measure of responsiveness for significant price changes that commonly occur in real-world markets.

Interpreting Elasticity Values

The interpretation of elasticity values provides crucial insights into consumer behavior and market characteristics. For price elasticity of demand, the absolute value determines whether demand is elastic or inelastic. When the absolute value exceeds one, demand is elastic, indicating that consumers are highly responsive to price changes – a small change in price causes a proportionally larger change in quantity demanded. When the absolute value is less than one, demand is inelastic, showing that consumers are relatively unresponsive to price changes – the quantity demanded changes proportionally less than the price13. Unit elasticity occurs when the absolute value equals one, indicating proportional changes in both price and quantity.

At the extremes of elasticity values, we find perfect elasticity and perfect inelasticity. Perfectly elastic demand (infinite elasticity) indicates that consumers will only purchase at exactly one price; any increase would reduce demand to zero, while any decrease would create unlimited demand. This is a theoretical concept rarely observed in real markets. Perfectly inelastic demand (zero elasticity) means quantity demanded remains constant regardless of price changes. Few goods exhibit perfect inelasticity, though some life-saving medications might approach this condition(14) Between these extremes, most products demonstrate varying degrees of elasticity depending on their characteristics and market conditions.

Elasticity values also have significant implications for business revenue and pricing strategies. For products with elastic demand, price reductions generally increase total revenue as the percentage increase in quantity exceeds the percentage decrease in price. Conversely, for products with inelastic demand, price increases typically boost total revenue as the percentage decrease in quantity is smaller than the percentage increase in price. This relationship between elasticity and total revenue forms the foundation for profit-maximizing pricing strategies across different market structures13. Understanding these implications helps businesses optimize pricing decisions to achieve their revenue and profit objectives.

Factors Influencing Elasticity of Demand

Availability of Substitutes

The availability and closeness of substitute goods stands as one of the most significant determinants of price elasticity of demand. When numerous close substitutes exist for a product, consumers can easily switch to alternatives if prices increase, resulting in higher elasticity. This substitution effect becomes particularly powerful when the substitutes are similar in quality and functionality to the original product. For example, different brands of breakfast cereals or various streaming services typically demonstrate high elasticity because consumers can readily shift between options with minimal impact on their satisfaction13. The degree of product differentiation therefore plays a crucial role in determining elasticity levels across markets.

The scope of product definition also significantly influences elasticity through its relationship with substitution possibilities. Broadly defined product categories generally exhibit lower elasticity than narrowly defined ones. For instance, "food" as a category has very low elasticity because alternatives are limited – people must eat. However, a specific food item like "organic quinoa" would have much higher elasticity as consumers can substitute other grains or non-organic versions13. This principle explains why individual companies typically face more elastic demand than entire industries for the same product type, as customers can switch between brands while still consuming the same general product.

Market structure and competitive conditions further affect elasticity through their impact on substitution opportunities. In highly competitive markets with many sellers offering similar products, individual firms face highly elastic demand curves since consumers have numerous alternatives. Conversely, in monopolistic or oligopolistic markets with few substitutes available, firms generally encounter less elastic demand curves. These structural factors help explain why elasticity values can vary significantly across different market contexts even for similar products15. Understanding these competitive dynamics is essential for businesses developing pricing strategies and for policymakers considering market regulations.

Necessity versus Luxury

The distinction between necessity and luxury goods fundamentally influences price elasticity of demand. Necessity goods fulfill basic human needs and typically have few or no substitutes, leading to relatively inelastic demand. Examples include staple foods, basic utilities, and essential medications. Even when prices for these items increase significantly, consumers typically maintain their purchasing levels because they cannot easily reduce consumption without considerable hardship. This inelasticity reflects the priority of necessities in consumer budgets and their essential role in maintaining basic living standards(3,14) The limited flexibility in consumption patterns for necessities makes their demand relatively unresponsive to price changes.

Luxury goods, in contrast, exhibit more elastic demand patterns because their consumption is discretionary rather than essential. As non-essential items that enhance comfort or status but aren't required for basic living, luxury products face greater consumer flexibility in purchasing decisions. When prices for luxury goods increase, consumers can postpone purchases or eliminate them entirely without significant immediate consequences. This discretionary nature makes demand for luxury products highly responsive to both price changes and income fluctuations17. The higher elasticity of luxury goods reflects consumers' greater willingness to adjust consumption based on economic conditions and personal financial circumstances.

The necessity-luxury distinction also manifests in income elasticity patterns, further illuminating consumer behavior. Necessities typically have income elasticity between zero and one, indicating that demand increases with income but at a proportionally lower rate – as people become wealthier, they spend more on necessities in absolute terms but these items represent a declining share of their total expenditure. Luxuries, conversely, typically have income elasticity greater than one, with demand increasing proportionally more than income rises. This pattern explains why luxury markets expand dramatically during economic booms and contract sharply during recessions, while markets for necessities remain relatively stable across economic cycles(14,7).

Time Horizon for Adjustment

The time period available for consumer adjustment significantly impacts elasticity measurements, with demand typically becoming more elastic over longer time horizons. In the immediate short run, consumers have limited flexibility to respond to price changes. Their consumption patterns are constrained by existing habits, contractual obligations, and lack of information about alternatives. However, as time passes, consumers gain greater ability to adjust their purchasing behavior by researching substitutes, developing new consumption habits, or adopting technologies that reduce dependency on products that have become more expensive13. This temporal dimension of elasticity reflects the progressive adaptation of consumer behavior to persistent price changes.

The increasing elasticity over time can be observed across many markets and products. For instance, gasoline demand might be highly inelastic in the immediate aftermath of a price increase as consumers have few immediate alternatives for transportation. In the medium term, consumers might arrange carpools or use public transportation more frequently. In the long run, they might purchase more fuel-efficient vehicles or relocate closer to work, substantially reducing their gasoline consumption. Each of these adjustments requires progressively more time but enables greater responsiveness to price changes, illustrating why long-run elasticity typically exceeds short-run elasticity for most products1315.

This temporal pattern of elasticity has important implications for business planning and policy implementation. Businesses implementing price increases might initially benefit from inelastic short-run demand, but must prepare for greater consumer response over time as elasticity increases. Similarly, policymakers using price mechanisms (such as taxes or subsidies) to influence consumption should recognize that the full impact of these measures may only become apparent after sufficient time has elapsed for complete consumer adjustment. Understanding these temporal dynamics helps organizations develop more effective strategies that account for evolving consumer responses over different time horizons13.

Proportion of Income Spent

The proportion of consumer income allocated to a particular good significantly influences its price elasticity of demand. Products that account for a small fraction of consumer budgets typically exhibit lower elasticity than those that represent substantial expenditures. When a product constitutes only a minor portion of total spending, consumers are less likely to notice price changes or find it worthwhile to search for alternatives, even when percentage price increases are substantial. For example, a 20% increase in the price of salt would have minimal impact on purchasing behavior because salt represents such a small part of most household budgets. This principle helps explain why many small everyday items demonstrate relatively inelastic demand despite having substitutes available1315.

Conversely, products that command a significant share of consumer income typically show greater elasticity. When price changes for these items materially affect overall budgets, consumers have stronger incentives to research alternatives, adjust consumption patterns, or postpone purchases. Major expenditures such as housing, vehicles, and higher education exemplify this category. Their substantial budget impact motivates consumers to respond more deliberately to price changes, comparing options carefully and potentially delaying purchases until favorable conditions emerge. This heightened price sensitivity translates into more elastic demand for big-ticket items compared to routine small purchases, even when controlling for other factors like availability of substitutes1517.

The relationship between budget share and elasticity also helps explain differences in elasticity across income groups for the same product. A good that represents a minor expense for high-income consumers but a substantial outlay for low-income households will typically demonstrate higher elasticity among lower-income groups. This differential response occurs because the same absolute price change translates to different proportional budget impacts across income segments. This principle helps businesses understand how price changes might differentially affect market segments and allows policymakers to anticipate the distributional effects of taxes or subsidies on products consumed across different income levels1317.

Historical Development and Significance

Marshall's Contribution to Elasticity Theory

Alfred Marshall made groundbreaking contributions to the theory of elasticity, formalizing the concept in his influential 1890 work "Principles of Economics." As the originator of the term "elasticity of demand," Marshall established the analytical foundation that economists continue to build upon today. His work came just four years after he had introduced the broader concept of economic elasticity coefficients, demonstrating the rapid development of his economic thinking during this period. To derive the equation for price elasticity of demand, Marshall ingeniously applied Cournot's demand curve creation methods, bridging earlier economic theory with new analytical approaches13. This methodological innovation exemplifies Marshall's talent for synthesizing and extending existing economic concepts.

Marshall's definition of elasticity emphasized the relative responsiveness of quantity demanded to changes in price, providing a nuanced perspective on consumer behavior. He observed that elasticity could be either "great or small" depending on how much the quantity sought increases or decreases for a given price change. Marshall noted that when elasticity is high (what we now call elastic demand), a small price reduction results in a disproportionately large increase in purchases. Conversely, when elasticity is low (inelastic demand), the same price reduction generates only a minor change in quantity demanded13. This framework helped explain varying market responses to price changes across different products and contexts.

The Marshallian approach to elasticity was characterized by its point-price definition, with elasticities calculated using differential calculus. This mathematical rigor allowed for precise analysis at specific points along a demand curve, establishing elasticity as a quantitative rather than merely qualitative concept. Marshall's work transformed economic analysis by providing tools to measure consumer responsiveness rather than simply describing it in general terms13. This quantification of market relationships represents one of the most significant advances in economic theory during the late 19th century, facilitating more precise analysis of market behavior and more effective application of economic principles to practical problems.

Contemporary Applications and Relevance

The elasticity concept maintains central importance in modern economic analysis, with applications spanning from business strategy to public policy. In corporate settings, elasticity measurements inform critical decisions about pricing, product development, and marketing strategies. Companies routinely conduct elasticity studies to determine optimal price points that maximize revenue or profit, understanding that the optimal strategy depends fundamentally on the elasticity characteristics of their products. For instance, firms selling products with inelastic demand can often increase profits through carefully calculated price increases, while those with highly elastic demand might maximize revenue through volume-based strategies with competitive pricing1317. This economic principle underpins sophisticated pricing models across industries.

In public policy, elasticity analysis guides taxation decisions, regulatory frameworks, and welfare programs. Governments seeking revenue typically impose higher taxes on products with inelastic demand (like cigarettes or gasoline) because such taxes generate substantial revenue with relatively modest reductions in consumption. Conversely, products with highly elastic demand make poor candidates for taxation as consumers quickly reduce purchases when prices rise, limiting revenue potential15. Policymakers also use elasticity concepts when designing interventions to change consumption patterns, recognizing that higher elasticity indicates greater consumer responsiveness to price incentives or penalties.

The digital economy has created new applications for elasticity analysis while also providing unprecedented data for more precise elasticity measurements. Online retailers can implement dynamic pricing strategies based on real-time elasticity calculations, adjusting prices to maximize revenue across different market segments and time periods. Similarly, subscription-based businesses carefully analyze price elasticity when setting tiered pricing models to optimize customer acquisition and retention1617. These contemporary applications demonstrate how Marshall's concept continues to evolve and maintain relevance in modern economic contexts, adapting to new business models and technological capabilities while retaining its fundamental analytical value.

Conclusion

Elasticity of demand stands as one of economics' most powerful analytical tools, providing crucial insights into market behavior and consumer responsiveness across diverse contexts. The various types of elasticity-price, income, and cross elasticity-offer complementary perspectives on how demand changes in response to different economic variables, creating a comprehensive framework for understanding market dynamics. The measurement approaches, from point elasticity to arc elasticity, provide practitioners with flexible methodologies applicable to different analytical situations and data availability scenarios. Together, these concepts form an essential toolkit for economic analysis in both theoretical and applied contexts131517.

The factors influencing elasticity-availability of substitutes, necessity versus luxury characteristics, time horizons, and budget proportions-explain why elasticity values vary across products, markets, and consumer segments. This variation is not random but follows economic principles that allow for prediction and explanation of consumer behavior patterns. Understanding these influencing factors enables businesses to anticipate how their specific markets might respond to price changes or other economic shifts1315. Similarly, policymakers can better predict the effects of their interventions when they understand the elasticity characteristics of targeted markets and the factors that shape those elasticity values.

Looking forward, elasticity concepts will continue to evolve alongside changes in economic structures, consumer behavior, and analytical capabilities. The increasing availability of granular data and advanced analytical tools promises more precise elasticity measurements, potentially revealing new insights about consumer responsiveness in specific contexts. Meanwhile, emerging market structures-particularly in digital and service economies-may create novel elasticity patterns that extend existing theoretical frameworks1617. Despite these ongoing developments, the fundamental principles of elasticity established by Marshall and refined by subsequent economists will remain essential for understanding market behavior and guiding economic decision-making across public and private sectors.

Reference:

  1. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/priceelasticity.asp
  2. https://www.vedantu.com/commerce/measurement-of-price-elasticity
  3. https://www.shaalaa.com/concept-notes/factors-influencing-the-elasticity-of-demand_13962
  4. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cross-elasticity-demand.asp
  5. https://www.economicsonline.co.uk/competitive_markets/point_elasticity_of_demand.html/
  6. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/arc-elasticity/
  7. https://www.economicsdiscussion.net/elasticity-of-demand/measuring-price-elasticity-of-demand-5-methods/6822
  8. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/principlesofmicroeconomicscdn/chapter/6-2-determinants-of-elasticity-of-demand/
  9. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/priceelasticity.asp
  10. https://kuona.ai/en/blog/what-is-elasticity-of-demand-definition-types/
  11. https://www.studysmarter.co.uk/explanations/business-studies/managerial-economics/point-elasticity/
  12. https://www.vedantu.com/commerce/measurement-of-price-elasticity
  13. https://www.shaalaa.com/question-bank-solutions/explain-the-types-of-elasticity-of-demand_207008
  14. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qVB5VcaAG8
  15. https://dspmuranchi.ac.in/pdf/Blog/Elasticity%20of%20Demand%20and%20its%20Types.pptx
  16. https://www.khanacademy.org/economics-finance-domain/microeconomics/elasticity-tutorial/price-elasticity-tutorial/a/price-elasticity-of-demand-and-price-elasticity-of-supply-cnx
  17. https://www.vedantu.com/commerce/elasticity-of-demand
  18. https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/6260/economics/difference-between-point-and-arc-elasticity-of-demand/
  19. https://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/wholefarm/pdf/c5-207.pdf
  20. https://epgp.inflibnet.ac.in/epgpdata/uploads/epgp_content/commerce/02._managerial_economics/06._measurement_of_elasticity/et/6467_et_com_p2_m6_etext(enhanced).pdf
  21. https://www.rncollegehajipur.in/rn/uploads/products/Elasticity%20of%20Demand.pdf
  22. https://edexceleconomicsrevision.com/home/theme-1-introduction-to-markets-and-market-faliure/price-income-and-cross-elasticities-of-demand/
  23. https://www.shaalaa.com/question-bank-solutions/what-are-types-elasticity-demand_397
  24. https://dducollegedu.ac.in/Datafiles/cms/ecourse%20content/elasticity%20of%20demand.pdf
  25. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/040315/what-factors-influence-change-demand-elasticity.asp
  26. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-macroeconomics/chapter/income-elasticity-cross-price-elasticity-other-types-of-elasticities/
  27. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/012915/what-difference-between-inelasticity-and-elasticity-demand.asp
  28. https://www.khanacademy.org/economics-finance-domain/microeconomics/elasticity-tutorial/price-elasticity-tutorial/a/price-elasticity-of-demand-and-price-elasticity-of-supply-cnx
  29. https://www.symson.com/blog/7-factors-affecting-price-elasticity-of-demand
  30. http://www.eagri.org/eagri50/AECO141/lec06.pdf
  31. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oD0gtwx0MhA
  32. https://www.idc-online.com/technical_references/pdfs/civil_engineering/What_are_the_various_methods_of_measuring_Elasticity_of_Demand.pdf
  33. https://www.shaalaa.com/question-bank-solutions/write-short-answer-following-question-explain-fectors-determinants-elastacity-demand_51247
  34. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/arc-elasticity.asp
  35. https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/glossary/arc-elasticity/
  36. https://www.mytutor.co.uk/answers/19974/IB/Economics/What-are-the-determinants-of-price-elasticity-of-demand/
  37. https://keydifferences.com/difference-between-point-and-arc-elasticity.html
  38. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arc_elasticity
  39. https://www.shaalaa.com/concept-notes/methods-of-measuring-price-elasticity-of-demand_13961

Post a Comment

0 Comments